From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Russell v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 1, 2018
SC: 156791 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)

Opinion

SC: 156791

05-01-2018

LAWRENCE RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices COA: 332934
Wayne CC: 15-002883-NO

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 1, 2018

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Russell v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 1, 2018
SC: 156791 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Russell v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF DETROIT…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 1, 2018

Citations

SC: 156791 (Mich. May. 1, 2018)