See also Ga. Comp. R. Regs. R. 616-1-2-.21 (4); Holland v. Tootle, 124 Ga. App. 186, 187 (1) ( 182 SE2d 898) (1971) (when the evidence is in conflict and the factfinder is in doubt as to where the preponderance of the evidence rested, the doubt should be solved in favor of the party that does not have the burden of proof). See also, e.g., Bankhead Enterprises v. Beavers, 267 Ga. 506 ( 480 SE2d 840) (1997); Russ v. American Tel. Telegraph, 228 Ga. App. 858 ( 493 SE2d 46) (1997) (The Board's appellate division may review the ALJ's findings of fact and is authorized to reverse the ALJ's decision if it is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence.). The Board's Issuance of Written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law