From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rusnack v. Rusnack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 14, 1984
101 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

May 14, 1984


In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated May 25, 1983, as denied his motion to eliminate or modify downward the alimony and child support provisions of an amended judgment of divorce between the parties, and (2) an order of the same court, dated July 8, 1983, as, upon renewal and reargument, adhered to the prior determination. ¶ Appeal from the order dated May 25, 1983 dismissed. That order was superseded by the order dated July 8, 1983, made upon renewal and reargument. ¶ Order dated July 8, 1983, affirmed, insofar as appealed from. No opinion. ¶ The respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rusnack v. Rusnack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 14, 1984
101 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Rusnack v. Rusnack

Case Details

Full title:MARY A. RUSNACK, Respondent, v. THEODORE J. RUSNACK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 14, 1984

Citations

101 A.D.2d 831 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)