From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rusk v. Roseen

Supreme Court of Montana
Feb 17, 2022
DA 21-0398 (Mont. Feb. 17, 2022)

Opinion

DA 21-0398

02-17-2022

ZACHARY RUSK, Petitioner and Appellant and THOMAS ROSEEN, CINDY ROSEEN, AND SHAWN ROSEEN, Respondents and Appellees.

Zachary Rusk Jason Armstrong, Cromwell Law, PLLC, On Behalf of the Roseens. Pro Se.


On Appeal from the Montana Eighteen Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, The Honorable Rienne H. McElyea, Presiding District Court Cause No. DV-21-432B.

APPEARANCES

Zachary Rusk Jason Armstrong, Cromwell Law, PLLC, On Behalf of the Roseens.

Pro Se.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Before the Court is the Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time. The Roseens request that the Court allow the Response to the Petition for Rehearing to be filed on or before March 11, 2022.

As this is the Respondent's first request for an extension of time, and for good cause shown:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Respondent shall file their Responsive document on or before March 11, 2022. DATED this 17th day of February, 2022.


Summaries of

Rusk v. Roseen

Supreme Court of Montana
Feb 17, 2022
DA 21-0398 (Mont. Feb. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Rusk v. Roseen

Case Details

Full title:ZACHARY RUSK, Petitioner and Appellant and THOMAS ROSEEN, CINDY ROSEEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

DA 21-0398 (Mont. Feb. 17, 2022)