From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rusk v. Brouwer

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Apr 5, 2023
Civil Action 9:22-CV-170 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:22-CV-170

04-05-2023

BILL RUSK, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BROUWER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Bill Rusk, an inmate confined at the Duncan Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multiple defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to the applicable laws and orders of this court. On December 7, 2022, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation (#5) in which he recommended dismissing this case for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). To date, Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report.

The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate judge (#5) is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Rusk v. Brouwer

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Apr 5, 2023
Civil Action 9:22-CV-170 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Rusk v. Brouwer

Case Details

Full title:BILL RUSK, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BROUWER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Apr 5, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 9:22-CV-170 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 5, 2023)