Rushton v. Marina Associates

Full title: EDITH RUSHTON, Plaintiff, v. MARINA ASSOCIATES, a New Jersey General…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 8, 2005

Civil Action No. 04-1889 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 8, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-1889.

September 8, 2005

ORDER

TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge

AND NOW, this 8^th day of September, 2005, after the plaintiff, Edith Rushton, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after an Amended Motion to Dismiss was submitted by defendant, Marina Associates, a New Jersey General Partnership d/b/a Harrah's Atlantic City d/b/a Harrah's New Jersey, Inc., and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 6] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment of this Court is entered pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.