From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rushton v. AW Chesterton Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 28, 2023
No. 22-500-BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 28, 2023)

Opinion

22-500-BJR

12-28-2023

MARTHA RUSHTON, Plaintiff, v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Barbara Jacobs Rothstein U.S. District Court Judge

Defendant Tate Andale, LLC filed a motion for summary judgment on October 26, 2023. ECF No. 81. Pursuant to this Court's Standing Order, ECF No. 31, Plaintiff's response in opposition was due on or before November 16, 2023. To date, no response has been filed.

Under the circumstances, the Court hereby directs Plaintiff to show cause within 14 days why Tate Andale's motion should not be granted as unopposed. Plaintiff's response to this order is due no later than January 11, 2024, and the Court re-notes Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 81, to January 11, 2024. Plaintiff's failure to respond will result in Tate Andale's motion being granted and the case against Tate Andale dismissed without further notice.


Summaries of

Rushton v. AW Chesterton Co.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 28, 2023
No. 22-500-BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Rushton v. AW Chesterton Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA RUSHTON, Plaintiff, v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 28, 2023

Citations

No. 22-500-BJR (W.D. Wash. Dec. 28, 2023)