Opinion
No. 05-14-01251-CR No. 05-14-01252-CR
09-29-2015
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-61091-W, F12-10110-W
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers
Opinion by Justice Francis
Lavandra Donteka Rushing appeals her convictions for abandoning a child with the intention to return and theft of property valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000. The trial court assessed punishment in each case at confinement for eighteen months in a state jail facility. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court's judgments. Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
141251F.U05
/Molly Francis/
MOLLY FRANCIS
JUSTICE
JUDGMENT
Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F13-61091-W).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED.
JUDGMENT
Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F12-10110-W).
Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the trial court's judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED.