From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rushdan v. Perbula

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0729 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0729 GEB GGH P.

August 24, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The filing fee for this action is $250. On April 5, 2006, plaintiff a partial filing fee of $150. On May 17, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the remaining portion of the filing fee within thirty days. The thirty day period expired and plaintiff did not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, on August 3, 2006, the court recommended that this action be dismissed.

On August 10, 2006, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff states that he did not receive the May 17, 2006, order. Plaintiff also states that he intends to pay the remaining portion of the filing fee that is due. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The August 3, 2006, findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to pay the remaining portion of the filing fee that is due.


Summaries of

Rushdan v. Perbula

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2006
No. CIV S-06-0729 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Rushdan v. Perbula

Case Details

Full title:SALADIN RUSHDAN aka ROBERT WOODS, Plaintiff, v. TOM PERBULA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 24, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0729 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2006)