From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rush v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 27, 2005
No. 05-05-01211-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2005)

Opinion

No. 05-05-01211-CR

Opinion Filed September 27, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-26489-T. Dismiss.

Before Justices MORRIS, WRIGHT, and RICHTER.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Michael Scott Rush appeals the trial court's order denying his request for appointed counsel to pursue post-conviction DNA proceedings. The order denying counsel is not a judgment of conviction, nor does it fall within the categories of appealable interlocutory orders. See Workman v. State, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex.Crim.App. 1961); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589-90 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.). Absent a judgment of conviction or other appealable order, we have no jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Rush v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Sep 27, 2005
No. 05-05-01211-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2005)
Case details for

Rush v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SCOTT RUSH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Sep 27, 2005

Citations

No. 05-05-01211-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2005)