From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rush v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-3796 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-cv-3796

04-09-2024

LARRY RUSH, Plaintiff, v. JAMIE K. SORBER, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 9th day of April 2024, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 2), the Amended Petition and Memorandum of Law in Support thereof, (ECF Nos. 5, 7) the Response to the Petition (ECF No. 14), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (ECF No. 15), and no objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that

1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. No certificate of appealability shall issue because the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Rush v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2024
Civil Action 22-cv-3796 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Rush v. Sorber

Case Details

Full title:LARRY RUSH, Plaintiff, v. JAMIE K. SORBER, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 9, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-cv-3796 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 9, 2024)