Opinion
No. 37 MAL 2022
06-27-2022
Matthew RUSH and Kathleen McGrogan-Rush, Respondents v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Petitioner
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW , this 27th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED . The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Whether the decision of the three-judge panel of the Superior Court is in direct conflict with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decisions in Burstein v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. , 570 Pa. 177, 809 A.2d 204 (2002) and Williams v. GEICO Gov't Emps. Ins. Co. , 613 Pa. 113, 32 A.3d 1195 (2011) and whether the Superior Court erred as a matter of law by finding that the "regular use exclusion" contained in Pennsylvania auto insurance policies violates the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.[ ] [§] 1701, et. seq.[.]