From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rush v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 10, 2013
3:12-cv-45-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

3:12-cv-45-CL

05-10-2013

ROBERT RUSH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983). I conclude the Report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#31) is adopted. This case is remanded for further administrative proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rush v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 10, 2013
3:12-cv-45-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Rush v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT RUSH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

3:12-cv-45-CL (D. Or. May. 10, 2013)