Opinion
No. 12373.
Argued October 31, 1968.
Decided November 4, 1968.
T.E. Pedersen, Charleston, S.C., for appellant.
J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N.C. (Fleming, Robinson Bradshaw, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.
The issues which arose in this case between a general contractor and his subcontractor are chiefly factual. There was conflict in the evidence which the District Judge resolved in a manner substantially supported in the record. We cannot say that his findings are clearly erroneous, and we find no error in the interpretation of the contract between the parties or other error of law.
Affirmed.