From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruona v. McBride

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2630 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2630 DFL KJM PS.

August 28, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 2, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 2, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant DMV's motion to dismiss is granted.


Summaries of

Ruona v. McBride

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-05-2630 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Ruona v. McBride

Case Details

Full title:MARTTI RUONA, Plaintiff, v. DEANNA McBRIDE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2630 DFL KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)