From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runnion v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jun 6, 1986
486 So. 2d 251 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-82.

April 9, 1986. Writ Denied June 6, 1986.

Michael Hantel, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Thompson Sellers, Roger C. Sellers, Rebecca Kirk, Abbeville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before GUIDRY and FORET, JJ., and HOOD, J. Pro Tem.

Judge Warren Hood of the 14th Judicial District Court participated in this decision as Judge Pro Tempore of the Third Circuit Court of Appeal.


The above numbered and entitled matter was consolidated for trial in the district court and on appeal with Courmier et al v. Travelers Insurance Co., et al, 486 So.2d 243 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1986).

For the reasons assigned in the companion case which bears our docket number 85-81, we amend the trial court's judgment to read as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that there be judgment herein in favor of Plaintiff, LUCILLE RUNNION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PROVISIONAL TUTRIX OF THE MINOR CHILD, BEVERLY COURMIER, and against Defendants, THE TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, SCHLUMBERGER OFFSHORE SERVICES and RICKY HUVAL, in the full and true sum of SEVEN THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TWENTY-TWO AND 95/100 ($7,822.95) DOLLARS, together with legal interest from date of Judicial Demand until paid.

In all other respects the judgment is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to appellants and one-half to appellee.

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.


Summaries of

Runnion v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jun 6, 1986
486 So. 2d 251 (La. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Runnion v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:LUCILLE RUNNION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 6, 1986

Citations

486 So. 2d 251 (La. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Courmier v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Lucille Runnion, did not answer the defendants' appeal. We will decide all issues in both cases in this…