From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runnels v. Amr. Red Cross

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Aug 31, 2011
No. 08-11-00211-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)

Opinion

No. 08-11-00211-CV

August 31, 2011.

Appeal from the 342nd District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, (TC# 342-243320-10).

Before CHEW, C.J., McCLURE, and RIVERA, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The clerk's record for this appeal was due on August 4, 2011. The district clerk notified the Clerk of this Court that Appellant failed to pay for the record. Consequently, the clerk's record has not been filed. On August 5, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified the parties that the Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless they showed grounds within ten days for continuing the appeal. The notice advised the parties that if no response was received, the appeal could be dismissed without further notice. No one has responded to the notice.

When the clerk's record is not filed because the appellant failed to pay for it, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant cures the deficiency or shows that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has been notified of the deficiency, but has neither cured it nor shown his entitlement to proceed without payment of costs. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Runnels v. Amr. Red Cross

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Aug 31, 2011
No. 08-11-00211-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Runnels v. Amr. Red Cross

Case Details

Full title:LV RUNNELS, Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS, AMERICAN RED CROSS CHISHOLM…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Aug 31, 2011

Citations

No. 08-11-00211-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 31, 2011)