From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Runge v. Runge

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Feb 20, 2001
625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001)

Opinion

No. 20000121

Decided February 20, 2001

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Ronald L. Hilden, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Edwin W. F. Dyer (argued), Dyer Summers, P.C., P.O. Box 2261, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2261, for plaintiff and appellant. Gregory Ian Runge, 418 E. Rosser Ave., Suite A, Bismarck, N.D. 58501.

Monte L. Rogneby, Vogel Law Firm, P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for defendant and appellee.


NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1


[¶ 1] Gregory Ian Runge appealed the district court's judgment determining the valuation and division of marital property. Gregory Runge claims the trial court erred by not explaining the distribution and by dividing the couple's property inequitably. We conclude the trial court's distribution of the couple's marital estate is not clearly erroneous. We therefore affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

William A. Neumann

Mary Muehlen Maring

Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J.

[¶ 3] Gordon O. Hoberg, S.J., sitting in place of Kapsner, J., disqualified.


Summaries of

Runge v. Runge

Supreme Court of North Dakota
Feb 20, 2001
625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001)
Case details for

Runge v. Runge

Case Details

Full title:Gregory Ian Runge, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Karen Kathleen Runge…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota

Date published: Feb 20, 2001

Citations

625 N.W.2d 264 (N.D. 2001)
2001 N.D. 39