From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUNG v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)

Opinion

November, 1923.

Present — H.T. Kellogg, Van Kirk, Hinman, Hasbrouck and McCann, JJ.


Title of proceeding corrected so as to describe the employer as the Bronx Parkway Commission, and as so corrected award unanimously affirmed on the authority of Madura v. Bronx Parkway Commission ( 206 App. Div. 598), decided herewith, without costs.


Summaries of

RUNG v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1923
207 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)
Case details for

RUNG v. CITY OF NEW YORK

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. ELIZABETH M. RUNG, Claimant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1923

Citations

207 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1923)