From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 8, 1926
210 N.W. 631 (Minn. 1926)

Opinion

No. 25,487.

October 8, 1926.

Case followed.

The answer stated a defense, following Rundlett v. Midland National Bank Trust Company, supra, page 434.

Plaintiff appealed from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Salmon, J., overruling his demurrer to the answer in an action upon a cashier's check. Affirmed.

L.K. Eaton and Selover, Schultz, Mansfield Bryan, for appellant.

Deutsch, Loeffler Amick, Brill Maslon and Robert S Kolliner, for respondent.



The demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant was overruled and he appeals.

The facts are substantially those alleged in the case of the same plaintiff against the Midland National Bank Trust Company, supra, page 434, except that Henderson received payment of the cashier's check issued by the Midland bank from the defendant, which later received payment from the Midland bank through the clearings. As in the case cited there is no merit in the demurrer.

Order affirmed.

HOLT, J., took no part.


Summaries of

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 8, 1926
210 N.W. 631 (Minn. 1926)
Case details for

Rundlett v. Bankers National Bank

Case Details

Full title:DEAN S. RUNDLETT v. BANKERS NATIONAL BANK

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 8, 1926

Citations

210 N.W. 631 (Minn. 1926)
210 N.W. 631