holding that plaintiff was not entitled to rely on a defendant's jury demand where the defendant had neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to make such a demand
Summary of this case from Great American Ins. Co. v. PrideNos. 94-191, 94-232.
October 3, 1994.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 F. 3d 83.
holding that plaintiff was not entitled to rely on a defendant's jury demand where the defendant had neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to make such a demand
Summary of this case from Great American Ins. Co. v. Prideapplying West Virginia law, and stating that, because an "action for unjust enrichment is quasi-contractual in nature[, it] may not be brought in the face of an express contract."
Summary of this case from Ash v. Allstate Ins. Co.modifying Moldea v. New York Times Co., 304 U.S. App. D.C. 406, 15 F.3d 1137 ( Moldea I)
Summary of this case from Guilford Transportation Industries v. Wilnerapplying New York law
Summary of this case from Azad Prop. Grp., LLC v. Willspring Holdings LLCFull title:RUMSEY ET AL. v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES ET…
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1994
[Appellant] claims that the court erred in not finding that the rejection of additional bills by [TICO]…
Zdziech v. D. of Health and SSFurthermore, as noted by the Bowden Court Bowden v. Delaware Dept. of Health and Social Services., Div. of…