From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumsey v. Gersten-Cramer Amusement Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

June, 1919.

Present — Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Smith, Page, and Philbin, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Clarke, P.J., dissented on the ground that under the peculiar terms of this contract and the nature of the property, he is of opinion that the amount deposited was in the nature of liquidated damages, and that, therefore, the complaint should have been dismissed.


Summaries of

Rumsey v. Gersten-Cramer Amusement Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1919
188 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Rumsey v. Gersten-Cramer Amusement Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN W. RUMSEY, Respondent, v. THE GERSTEN-CRAMER AMUSEMENT COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1919

Citations

188 App. Div. 965 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)