From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumph v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 10, 2020
291 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. 1D18-3974

03-10-2020

Tavares RUMPH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Tavares Rumph, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Tavares Rumph, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

Wolf, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rumph v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 10, 2020
291 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Rumph v. State

Case Details

Full title:TAVARES RUMPH, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

Citations

291 So. 3d 919 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Citing Cases

Rumph v. Dixon

The First DCA denied the petition on March 10, 2020. Rumph v. State, No. 1D18-3974, 291 So.3d 919 (Fla.…