From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumola v. Maimonides Med. Ctr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-11

Dawn RUMOLA, etc., appellant,v.MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, respondent.


John A. Corring, New City, N.Y., for appellant.

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Richard E. Lerner and Judy C. Selmeci of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dabiri, J.), dated November 21, 2008, which granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In 1998, Anna Rumola, as administratrix of the estate of Thomas Sharp, commenced an action against the defendant. On November 16, 1999, Anna Rumola died. In 2007 the Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion pursuant to CPLR 1021 to dismiss the action “with prejudice” due to the failure of the persons interested in the decedent's estate to move for a substitution within a reasonable time. Dawn Rumola, as “Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Sharp,” subsequently commenced this action based on the same transactions and occurrences as those in the prior action.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. Under the circumstances of this case, the dismissal of the prior action was for “neglect to prosecute,” rendering the exception to the statute of limitations in CPLR 205(a) unavailable to the plaintiff ( see Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C. [ Habiterra Assoc.], 5 N.Y.3d 514, 520, 806 N.Y.S.2d 453, 840 N.E.2d 565; Flans v. Federal Ins. Co., 43 N.Y.2d 881, 882, 403 N.Y.S.2d 466, 374 N.E.2d 365; Bauer v. Mars Assoc., 35 A.D.3d 333, 334, 825 N.Y.S.2d 536; cf. Freedman v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens, 9 A.D.3d 415, 780 N.Y.S.2d 366).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contention.

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rumola v. Maimonides Med. Ctr.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 11, 2011
88 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Rumola v. Maimonides Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:Dawn RUMOLA, etc., appellant,v.MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

88 A.D.3d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
930 N.Y.S.2d 902
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7211

Citing Cases

Duval v. Centerlight Health Sys., Inc.

The new standard specifies that an order dismissing a case for neglect to prosecute must set forth on the…

Weisman, Celler, Spett & Modlin v. Fischbach LLC

The court correctly granted the motion. Contrary to plaintiff's claim, CPLR 205(a) does not save the instant…