From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rukeyser v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 4, 2007
43 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-08918.

September 4, 2007.

In an action, inter alia, to recover fees for legal services rendered, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered March 23, 2006, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Leacroft Richardson which was to vacate his default in answering.

Richard St. Paul, Bronx, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein, Covello and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court has inherent discretionary power to vacate a default which is not subject to the one-year limitation in CPLR 5015 ( see Ray Realty Fulton, Inc. v Lee, 7 AD3d 772, 773). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Leacroft Richardson which was to vacate his default in answering based on his presentation of a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Montefiore Med. Ctr. v Hartford Ace. Indem. Co., 37 AD3d 673; Mele v Okubo, 36 AD3d 599, 600).


Summaries of

Rukeyser v. Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 4, 2007
43 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Rukeyser v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD RUKEYSER, Appellant, v. LEACROFT RICHARDSON, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 4, 2007

Citations

43 A.D.3d 815 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 6539
840 N.Y.S.2d 872

Citing Cases

Rukeyser v. Richardson

Decided March 31, 2009. Reported below, 43 AD3d 815. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground…

Nassau Operating Co. v. DeSimone

Furthermore, as set forth in more detail below, she demonstrated a meritorious defense to this action (see…