From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. Woodfill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P

06-04-2021

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. D. WOODFILL, Defendant.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2021, it appears that plaintiff is attempting to renew his request that the court appoint counsel. However, plaintiffs filing is written entirely in Spanish. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiff was previously advised that all documents submitted for filing in this action must be written in English. To the extent plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel or an interpreter, plaintiffs request is denied for the reasons set forth in the court's April 23, 2021 order. (ECF No. 52.) In all other respects, plaintiffs filing is disregarded because it is not written in English.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion (ECF No. 54) is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Ruiz v. Woodfill

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 4, 2021
2:19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Ruiz v. Woodfill

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. D. WOODFILL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 4, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-2118 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2021)