From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. Gates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 5, 2021
2:19-CV-2518-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-CV-2518-KJM-DMC-P

08-05-2021

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. S. GATES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs request, ECF No. 14, to admit evidence. Plaintiffs motion is denied without prejudice as premature. At the current stage of the case, before the matter has become at-issue with the filing of an answer, there is no need to admit or consider evidence. At a later stage in the proceedings, following completion of discovery, the Court will permit entry of evidence in the proper context, i.e., a motion for summary judgment or at a trial on the merits.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs request, ECF No. 14, is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Ruiz v. Gates

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 5, 2021
2:19-CV-2518-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Ruiz v. Gates

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. S. GATES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 5, 2021

Citations

2:19-CV-2518-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2021)