affirming district court's decree after trial; eighth amendment claim "must be determined on the facts of each case and the evidence in each case should support the existence of any health hazard under the specific circumstances involved"
Summary of this case from Pressley v. BrownNo. 82-5921.
March 21, 1983, October TERM, 1982.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 679 F. 2d 1115 and 688 F. 2d 266.
affirming district court's decree after trial; eighth amendment claim "must be determined on the facts of each case and the evidence in each case should support the existence of any health hazard under the specific circumstances involved"
Summary of this case from Pressley v. Brownespousing a "totality of conditions" test
Summary of this case from Hamm v. DeKalb Countyapplying the cause and prejudice standard in the context of a Sandstrom claim
Summary of this case from McBee v. GrantFull title:RUIZ ET AL. v. ESTELLE ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 21, 1983
In a later action, the Fifth Circuit found that a court was not required to wait for noncompliance before…
Moody v. Miller9. Prisoners charged with rule violations shall be present at disciplinary hearings unless their behavior…