From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00759-DAD-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-00759-DAD-SKO (HC)

07-12-2021

GUADALUPE RUIZ, Petitioner, v. T. CISNEROS, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

[DOC. 14]

[THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE]

SHEILA K. OBERTO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 9, 2021, Respondent filed a request for a sixty (60) day extension of time to file a response to the petition. (Doc. 14.) The Court finds good cause to extend the deadline by an additional thirty (30) days. Should additional time be desired, Respondent may file a request for a second extension of time with a showing of good cause.

Based on the foregoing, Respondent is GRANTED thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order to file a response.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ruiz v. Cisneros

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 12, 2021
1:21-cv-00759-DAD-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Ruiz v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:GUADALUPE RUIZ, Petitioner, v. T. CISNEROS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 12, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-00759-DAD-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2021)