From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. Bodukam

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:19-cv-00146-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00146-TLN-DMC

09-30-2021

ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. VIJAY BODUKMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on September 15, 2020, and this action is closed. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 34) for reconsideration of the Court's September 15, 2020, final judgment and for appointment of counsel. This is the third motion for reconsideration and fourth motion for appointment of counsel filed by Plaintiff since the action was closed over a year ago.

Having reviewed Plaintiff's motion, the Court finds no basis for reconsideration of the September 15, 2020, final judgment or the appointment of counsel in this closed case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 34) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Ruiz v. Bodukam

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:19-cv-00146-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Ruiz v. Bodukam

Case Details

Full title:ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. VIJAY BODUKMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-00146-TLN-DMC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)