Ruiz v. Akintola

Full title: BRANDON RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. DR. AKINTOLA, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

No. CIV S-09-0318 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0318 JAM GGH P.

June 23, 2009

ORDER

JOHN MENDEZ, District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 17, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 17, 2009, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's April 8, 2009, motion for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction (Docket # 20) is denied.