From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz Food Prods. Inc. v. Catlin Underwriting U.S. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-CV-00889-OWW-DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-CV-00889-OWW-DLB

08-05-2011

RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff, v. CATLIN UNDERWRITING U.S., INC.; CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. PCI937441010, and DOES 1-200, inclusive Defendants

RICHARD C. CROSSMAN, #047630 MICHAEL L. RENBERG, #136217 PARICHAN, RENBERG & CROSSMAN LAW CORPORATION Attorney for Plaintiff RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.


RICHARD C. CROSSMAN, #047630

MICHAEL L. RENBERG, #136217

PARICHAN, RENBERG & CROSSMAN

LAW CORPORATION

Attorney for Plaintiff

RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT

LLOYD'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT CATLIN

UNDERWRITING AGENCY U.S.'S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Courtroom of Hon. Oliver W. Wanger

On August 1, 2011, the motion of Defendant Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. PCI937441010 (hereinafter "Catlin Syndicate") for dismissal of the complaint filed by Plaintiff Ruiz Food Products, Inc. pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure came on for hearing. Also set for hearing on August 1, 2011 was the motion to dismiss of Defendant Catlin Underwriting Agency U.S., Inc. (Catlin Underwriting).

Appearing for Plaintiff Ruiz Food Products was Michael L. Renberg. Appearing for Defendant Catlin Syndicate was Ryan H. Opgenorth.

The court, having reviewed the moving papers, opposition papers and reply papers submitted by the parties, and providing the parties an opportunity to be heard, and having issued a memorandum decision, enters the follow order:

1. The motion of Defendant Catlin Syndicate to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint is DENIED. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow a plaintiff to generally allege that all conditions precedents have occurred or been performed. The complaint filed by Plaintiff includes allegations in paragraph 22 and 26 that it has performed all obligations required to be performed under the terms of the policy and that Defendant had refused to pay benefits owed pursuant to the subject insurance policy. Such allegations meet the requirements of Rule 12(b)(6) that the complaint contain sufficient factual matters, accepted as true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.

2. The motion of Defendant Catlin Underwriting to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED, without prejudice. Plaintiff stipulated to the dismissal of Catlin Underwriting without prejudice.

3. Defendant Catlin Syndicate is to file an answer to the complaint 14 days after entry of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Oliver W. Wanger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ruiz Food Prods. Inc. v. Catlin Underwriting U.S. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 5, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-CV-00889-OWW-DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Ruiz Food Prods. Inc. v. Catlin Underwriting U.S. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RUIZ FOOD PRODUCTS, INC., a California Corporation Plaintiff, v. CATLIN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-CV-00889-OWW-DLB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)