From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rugiero v. Dinardo

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 3, 2013
493 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2013)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 145577 145578 145579 145580 145581 145582 145583 145584. COA Nos. 301829 302192 302228 302936 302963 303259 303707 307630.

2013-04-3

Patrick A. RUGIERO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Antonietta M. DINARDO, Defendant–Appellee.


Prior report: Mich.App., 2012 WL 2335933.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals related to the imposition of attorney fees, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for an evidentiary hearing regarding whether the fees granted in the court's earlier interim awards pursuant to MCR 3.206(C) should be imposed as a final matter or otherwise modified as the evidence and circumstances may warrant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Rugiero v. Dinardo

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 3, 2013
493 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2013)
Case details for

Rugiero v. Dinardo

Case Details

Full title:Patrick A. RUGIERO, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Antonietta M. DINARDO…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 3, 2013

Citations

493 Mich. 957 (Mich. 2013)
493 Mich. 957