Ruggles v. Marshall

Full title: JOHNNY LEE RUGGLES, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, et al., Respondents

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 13, 2009

No. CIV S-08-2071 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2071 JAM GGH P.

February 13, 2009

ORDER

JOHN MENDEZ, District Judge

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 25, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 25, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).