From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruggles v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Jul 22, 2011
NO. 4:10-CV-533-A (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2011)

Opinion

NO. 4:10-CV-533-A.

July 22, 2011


ORDER


On June 17, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation in the above-referenced case. The recommendation is that the decision of defendant, Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner"), that plaintiff, Dwight D. Ruggles, was not disabled under Title II of the Social Security Act, be affirmed. Plaintiff timely filed his objections, and the government filed a response thereto. After a thorough study of the record, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and conclusions, the parties' filings, and applicable legal authorities, the court has concluded that plaintiff's objections lack merit and that the recommendation of the magistrate judge should be accepted. Therefore,

See Notice of Decision — Unfavorable, Tr. at 15, 26, which became the final decision of the Commissioner, id. at 7.

The court accepts the recommendation of the magistrate judge and ORDERS that the decision of the Commissioner that plaintiff is not disabled under Title II of the Social Security Act be, and is hereby, affirmed.


Summaries of

Ruggles v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division
Jul 22, 2011
NO. 4:10-CV-533-A (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Ruggles v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT D. RUGGLES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division

Date published: Jul 22, 2011

Citations

NO. 4:10-CV-533-A (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2011)