Rugala v. New Jersey Insurance Underwriting Association

Full title: PAUL RUGALA, ANNA RUGALA AND ANTHONY J. POLAKAS, PLAINTIFFS, v. NEW JERSEY…

Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 26, 1993

131 N.J. 110 (N.J. 1993)

618 A.2d 348

Opinion

Argued October 26, 1992 —

Decided January 26, 1993.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Lars S. Hyberg argued the cause for appellant ( McAllister, Westmoreland, Vesper Schwartz, attorneys).

Thomas A. Shovlin argued the cause for respondent ( Riley, Di Camillo Shovlin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brochin's majority opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 131 N.J. Super. 139, 618 A.2d 352 (1992).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.