From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rufrano v. Yovino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
May 23, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71401 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

Motion No: 2018-01991 KC

05-23-2019

Frederick Rufrano, Respondent, v. Michael Yovino, Appellant.


MICHELLE WESTON

THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by appellant to enlarge the time to perfect an appeal from a decision of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County, dated August 23, 2018.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion seeking an enlargement of time to perfect the appeal is denied as premature, as the record on appeal has not yet been received by this court. Pursuant to the Rules of the Appellate Term for the 2nd, 11th & 13th Judicial Districts (22 NYCRR) §§ 731.8 (a) and 731.4(a)(1), appellant's time to perfect the appeal does not begin to run until a record on appeal has been filed with the clerk of this court. Inasmuch as the record on appeal has not been filed to date, the motion is premature.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Rufrano v. Yovino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
May 23, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71401 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Rufrano v. Yovino

Case Details

Full title:Frederick Rufrano, Respondent, v. Michael Yovino, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: May 23, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71401 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)