Opinion
No. A138480.
07-22-2014
JAMES RUFINI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.
[Modification of opinion (227 Cal.App.4th 579; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing]
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT. — IT IS ORDERED that footnote 19 on page 17 [227 Cal.App.4th 598, advance report] of the opinion filed herein on June 27, 2014, be modified to read as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:
Although the remedies provided by section 1871.7 are expressly nonexclusive, and section 1871.7 expressly provides for equitable remedies, the precise nature and extent of the equitable or other remedies that might or might not be available is not among the issues raised in this proceeding. This opinion's discussion of particular potential remedies should not be understood to preclude the adjudication of these issues when they are appropriately raised. We also express no opinion on the question whether violations of subdivision (a) might give rise to remedies under provisions such as the unfair competition law, Business and Professions Code section 17200 et seq.
There is no change in the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.