From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruffin v. Hinkley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 16, 2018
Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT (D. Me. Jul. 16, 2018)

Opinion

Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT

07-16-2018

DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HINKLEY, et al., Defendants


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On June 21, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 33). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Nancy Torresen

United States Chief District Judge Dated this 16th day of July, 2018.


Summaries of

Ruffin v. Hinkley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jul 16, 2018
Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT (D. Me. Jul. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Ruffin v. Hinkley

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL ONEIL RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HINKLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jul 16, 2018

Citations

Docket no. 2:17-cv-151-NT (D. Me. Jul. 16, 2018)