From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUFF v. STATE

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc
Jul 15, 1949
41 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1949)

Opinion

July 15, 1949.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Bayard B. Shields, Judge.

J. Henry Taylor, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Proceeding between Garfield Ruff and the State of Florida. From an adverse determination, the former appeals.

Affirmed.


We have examined and considered the record in this case in the light of briefs filed and have also, pursuant to subparagraph (2) of Section 924.32, Florida Statutes 1941, and F.S.A., reviewed the evidence to determine if the interests of justice require a new trial, with the result that we find no reversible error is made to appear and the evidence does not reveal that the ends of justice require a new trial to be awarded.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, BARNS and HOBSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RUFF v. STATE

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc
Jul 15, 1949
41 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1949)
Case details for

RUFF v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:RUFF v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc

Date published: Jul 15, 1949

Citations

41 So. 2d 449 (Fla. 1949)