From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruff v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1979
399 N.E.2d 544 (N.Y. 1979)

Opinion

Submitted October 12, 1979

Decided November 13, 1979

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, F. WARREN TRAVERS, J.

Roger J. Cusick for appellants.

James M. Woolsey, Jr., for respondents.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice PAUL T. KANE.

We would note that at the time of this trial, proof of freedom from contributory negligence was a necessary element of the infant plaintiff's case. Even if there were adequate evidence of the plaintiff's amnesia, permitting a lower degree of proof of this element (Schechter v Klanfer, 28 N.Y.2d 228), no request was made for this charge, nor was any objection made to the charge that the plaintiff had the standard burden. The unexcepted to charge became the law of the case (Olsen v Chase Manhattan Bank, 9 N.Y.2d 829).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Ruff v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 13, 1979
399 N.E.2d 544 (N.Y. 1979)
Case details for

Ruff v. Snyder

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE RUFF, an Infant, by FREDERICK H. RUFF, JR., His Father and…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 13, 1979

Citations

399 N.E.2d 544 (N.Y. 1979)
399 N.E.2d 544
423 N.Y.S.2d 657

Citing Cases

Up-Front Industries, Inc. v. U.S. Industries

This was error. "Because no exception was taken to the charge * * * to the jury, the court had no authority…

Titlebaum v. Loblaws, Inc.

They argued that in any event Maxanne was not involved in any conduct contributing to the bottle breaking and…