From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUFF v. COUNTY OF KINGS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2008
CASE NO: 1:05-CV-00631 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO: 1:05-CV-00631 OWW GSA.

February 24, 2008

Benjamin L. Ratliff, Esq. Bar No. 113708, Michael R. Linden, Esq. Bar No. 192485, THE LAW FIRM OF WEAKLEY, RATLIFF, ARENDT McGUIRE, LLP, Fresno, California, Attorneys for Defendants, County of Kings, Mark Sherman, Sandy R. Roper, William R. Zumwalt.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DATE FOR PENDING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND FOR RELATED NECESSARY RELIEF


The Ex Parte Application for Continuance of Hearing Date for Pending Summary Judgment Motion, and for Related Necessary Relief of plaintiff DANIEL RUFF (hereinafter "Plaintiff") came for a hearing before The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger on January 4, 2008, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff was represented by Kevin G. Little, Esq. Defendants COUNTY OF KINGS; MARK SHERMAN; SANDY R. ROPER; WILLIAM R. ZUMWALT (collectively hereinafter "Defendants") were represented by Michael R. Linden, Esq., of the Law Firm of Weakley, Ratliff, Arendt, McGuire, LLP.

After full consideration of the moving and opposition papers, as well as oral argument from counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Plaintiff's Application is GRANTED.

The following schedule shall govern the further handing of Defendants' pending Motion for Summary Judgment by the parties:

Plaintiff will be allowed to take the depositions of witnesses needed to oppose defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's Opposition to said motion is to be filed on or before April 4, 2008. No further extensions of time will be granted.

Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition is to be filed on or before April 11, 2008. Should Defendants need additional time to file their Reply, they are to seek relief from the Court prior to the filing date.

The hearing for Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment will take place on May 5, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3.

The current pre-trial and trial dates, pursuant to the operative scheduling order, are hereby vacated. A scheduling conference will take place on May 30, 2008, at 8:15 a.m., in Courtroom 3.

A telephone conference was held before The Honorable Oliver W. Wanger on February 4, 2008, at 3:00 p.m. regarding the specifics of the court's order rendered on January 4, 2008. Plaintiff was represented by Kevin G. Little, Esq. All named defendants were represented by Benjamin L. Ratliff and Michael R. Linden, Esq., of the Law Firm of Weakley, Ratliff, Arendt, McGuire, LLP.

After having considered the arguments of counsel, it is hereby ordered that the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed on January 31, 2008 (Court Doc. 57) is stricken. Plaintiff is ordered to file a Motion For Leave To File a FAC on or before February 11, 2008. Defendants' response is due on or before February 22, 2008. No reply shall be filed. The hearing on the motion shall be held on March 3, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3.

Approved as to form and content.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

RUFF v. COUNTY OF KINGS

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2008
CASE NO: 1:05-CV-00631 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2008)
Case details for

RUFF v. COUNTY OF KINGS

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL RUFF, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF KINGS; MARK SHERMAN; SANDY R. ROPER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2008

Citations

CASE NO: 1:05-CV-00631 OWW GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2008)