From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruetz v. Maxmillan

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Nov 20, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-1629-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 6:06-cv-1629-Orl-31JGG.

November 20, 2006


ORDER


Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. 13), his "affidavit" (Doc. 10), and Defendant's Response (Doc. 12), it is

ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until December 1, 2006 to respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5).

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ruetz v. Maxmillan

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Nov 20, 2006
Case No. 6:06-cv-1629-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2006)
Case details for

Ruetz v. Maxmillan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID RUETZ, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH MAXMILLAN and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2006

Citations

Case No. 6:06-cv-1629-Orl-31JGG (M.D. Fla. Nov. 20, 2006)