From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudy v. Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

558 CA 19-02101

12-23-2020

Tara K. RUDY and Lorne M. Rudy, Claimants-Respondents, v. ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Respondent-Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.)

McGIVNEY, KLUGER, CLARK & INTOCCIA, P.C., SYRACUSE (LEIGH A. LIEBERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOSHUA M. GILLETTE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.


McGIVNEY, KLUGER, CLARK & INTOCCIA, P.C., SYRACUSE (LEIGH A. LIEBERMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROBERT E. LAHM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOSHUA M. GILLETTE OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

ORDER

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 15, 2020,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.


Summaries of

Rudy v. Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 2057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

Rudy v. Altmar-Parish-Williamstown Cent. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:Tara K. RUDY and Lorne M. Rudy, Claimants-Respondents, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 2057 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
134 N.Y.S.3d 838