From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudoy v. Rudoy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 5, 2016
206 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D16–2081.

10-05-2016

Eugene RUDOY, Petitioner, v. Denis RUDOY, Respondent.

Eugene Rudoy, in proper person. Anna C. Fernandez, for respondent.


Eugene Rudoy, in proper person.

Anna C. Fernandez, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

Petitioner, Eugene Rudoy, seeks a writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial court judge. We deny the petition.

On October 21, 2015, Petitioner moved to disqualify the trial court judge based on comments made at a July 9, 2015 hearing. The motion was denied by the trial court judge on November 4, 2015. Rudoy filed the instant petition with this Court on September 9, 2016.

Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(e) states that "[a] motion to disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion and shall be promptly presented to the court for an immediate ruling." Because the motion to disqualify was not timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(e), the petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See State v. Oliu, 183 So.3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) ; Sherman v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands, 939 So.2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition denied.


Summaries of

Rudoy v. Rudoy

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Oct 5, 2016
206 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rudoy v. Rudoy

Case Details

Full title:Eugene RUDOY, Petitioner, v. Denis RUDOY, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

206 So. 3d 761 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)