Opinion
2015-1434
02-03-2016
RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant
DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, MICHAEL A. ERBELE. DANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M. STERN; DAVID LEON BILSKER, San Francisco, CA.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:05-cv-01396-JRT-FLN, Judge John R. Tunheim.
JUDGMENT
DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, MICHAEL A. ERBELE. DANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M. STERN; DAVID LEON BILSKER, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 3, 2016
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court