From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1933
238 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

June 30, 1933.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

John W. Davis and William C. Cannon of counsel [ David E. Hudson with them on the brief; Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner Reed, attorneys], for the defendant.

Borris M. Komar, for the plaintiff.

Present — FINCH, P.J., McAVOY, MARTIN, O'MALLEY and TOWNLEY, JJ. McAVOY, J., taking no part.


The decision upon which the judgment appealed from rests is predicated upon the law as applied by the learned referee in Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U.S. ( 144 Misc. 363), the appeal from which is decided herewith ( 238 App. Div. 696). Our decision therein adopts the findings and conclusions of the referee so far as material to sustain the decision herein.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be in all respects affirmed, without costs.


Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, without costs, with leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals if so advised.


Summaries of

Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1933
238 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.

Case Details

Full title:NISEL A. GOLDBERG RUDKOWSKY, Respondent, Appellant, v. THE EQUITABLE LIFE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
265 N.Y.S. 721

Citing Cases

Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.

The court, in its opinion in the Kinney case, said (at p. 346): "Of course an argument can be made on the…