From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudisill v. Ryan

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 12, 2024
No. CV-13-01149-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Feb. 12, 2024)

Opinion

CV-13-01149-TUC-CKJ

02-12-2024

Stephen Louis Rudisill, Plaintiff, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Cindy K. Jorgenson, J

On February 5, 2016, by Order (Doc. 139). this Court terminated this case pursuant to an Amended Stipulation (Doc. 119) calling for certain actions to be taken by Defendants and for oversite by a Court Monitor, James Austin, Ph.D., who has been monitoring Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry's (ADCRR) progress and compliance for the last 5 years (2016-2023). He indicates that ADCRR has successfully integrated and recommends an end to monitoring. Defendants' request termination of the Amended Stipulation. There is no objection, and the Court finds good cause, Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Terminate Amended Stipulation for Order and all Amendments Thereto (Doc. 145) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Stipulation for Order (Doc. 119) and any amendments thereto is hereby formally terminated.


Summaries of

Rudisill v. Ryan

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 12, 2024
No. CV-13-01149-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Feb. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Rudisill v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Louis Rudisill, Plaintiff, v. Charles Ryan, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Feb 12, 2024

Citations

No. CV-13-01149-TUC-CKJ (D. Ariz. Feb. 12, 2024)