Rudisell v. State

Full title: NORMAN RUDISELL, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 27, 1990

557 So. 2d 226 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-155.

February 27, 1990.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Arthur L. Rothenberg, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Kenneth R. Drake, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, COPE and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla. 1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (1986).

Affirmed.