From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rudis v. Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 1949
65 A.2d 579 (Conn. 1949)

Opinion

Argued January 7, 1949

Decided March 15, 1949.

Action for a declaratory judgment determining the validity of certain zoning regulations as applied to the plaintiffs, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County and tried to the court, O'Sullivan, J.; judgment for the defendant and appeal by the plaintiffs. No error.

James O. Shea and Clarence A. Hadden, with whom, on the brief, was William E. Allen, Jr., appeared for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Pierce J. Gerety appeared for the appellee (defendant).


The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment determining that the 1500-foot limitation relating to liquor outlets contained in the Fairfield zoning regulations is illegal and void, and affirmative relief. The Superior Court rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed.

The single issue is essentially the same as the first one considered in Miller v. Zoning Commission, reported immediately before the present case, and is governed by the decision in that case and by State ex rel. Wise v. Turkington, 135 Conn. 276, 63 A.2d 596.


Summaries of

Rudis v. Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 1949
65 A.2d 579 (Conn. 1949)
Case details for

Rudis v. Zoning Commission

Case Details

Full title:SALLY W. RUDIS ET AL. v. ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF FAIRFIELD

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 15, 1949

Citations

65 A.2d 579 (Conn. 1949)
135 Conn. 410

Citing Cases

Gartland v. Talbott

In view of facts and the proximity of the district to the city of Lewiston, the court cannot determine that…